Forum Discussion
toedtoes
Sep 04, 2015Explorer III
I'm going to assume that the OP is looking at this from the idea of touring NPs rather than just visiting one or two at a time.
For that, I do see more of a negative as the OP suggests. It'd be like touring NYC, Toronto, Chicago, Dallas and San Francisco in one go - why? After the 2nd city, the downsides of being in a crowded city start to overwhelm and the excitement gets lost.
So, I would suggest NOT doing a "tour" of similar places. Instead, make a trip out of different interests - visit an NP, then do some wine tasting, then go to a ball game, then visit a historical site, etc. Mix up what you're seeing, where you're staying, etc., during the trip. Don't just go to Grand Canyon, Moab, Yellowstone, Yosemite...
This has the added benefit of turning one quick and dirty trip into a lifetime of trips.
For that, I do see more of a negative as the OP suggests. It'd be like touring NYC, Toronto, Chicago, Dallas and San Francisco in one go - why? After the 2nd city, the downsides of being in a crowded city start to overwhelm and the excitement gets lost.
So, I would suggest NOT doing a "tour" of similar places. Instead, make a trip out of different interests - visit an NP, then do some wine tasting, then go to a ball game, then visit a historical site, etc. Mix up what you're seeing, where you're staying, etc., during the trip. Don't just go to Grand Canyon, Moab, Yellowstone, Yosemite...
This has the added benefit of turning one quick and dirty trip into a lifetime of trips.
About Campground 101
Recommendations, reviews, and the inside scoop from fellow travelers.14,716 PostsLatest Activity: Oct 15, 2013