3M Crystaline Window film vs Double Pane Windows

Lexx wrote:
So at this point if I can get a better deal on dealer in stock units despite not having double pane windows, at least I can add the window film afterwards.

The 3M film isn't cheaper and you think you will get a better deal buying dealer stock. That is what the dealer wants, someone buying on emotion, that 'new car smell' rather than buying ONLY based on the numbers on the deal. I have ordered units and known dealer cost for every option I ordered. I've also seen dealers use false MSRP's to make their deal look unbeatable.

valhalla360 wrote:
Insulation is insulation doesn't matter if it's hot or cold.

Remember the most amazing invention is the thermo-bottle. How does it know to keep hot items hot and cold items cold??? , , , , , :h

Thank you for all the useful testimonials! I had not made up my mind one way or the other, but the smaller air gap in rv windows does make sense. The noise issue is a significant issue, but I can put up with noise more than heat. I just hate it when it's is too warm inside So at this point if I can get a better deal on dealer in stock units despite not having double pane windows, at least I can add the window film afterwards.

I have the Crystalline tint on my pick up windows and it works GREAT at heat rejection. Can put back of hand next to driver's window and yes it's warm, but doable. Do the same thing w/ the windshield and about burn hand!. Nice thing about the Crystalline is that's a clear tint (albeit some darkness) that offers that same amount of heat/UV etc protection as the dark tint and it's hard to notice that it's on the windows of truck. Here in NY, not supposed to have anything pretty much on doors as 70% light has to x-fer in This basically means factory glass all the way around. Dark back windows from factory are ok. There are a couple things you can do to allow the use of it, but need a Dr note and all to have windows tinted. 3M offers a light tint Crystalline that has UV protection (cannot recall at this typing about heat rejection) and when applied to vehicles is legal. My tint is just a RCH over legal or like 67%. Am considering replacing my dark tint from box store on semi w/ the 3M stuff. Well worth it IMO---Crystalline that is.

waltbennett wrote:
Dual and triple pane windows in homes have an air gap of roughly 1/2 inch in order to provide meaningful insulation. Dual pane windows for RVs do NOT have enough air gap to provide anything close to the same. Their nothing but hype and a way to get more money out of a buyer. Better to use film if you want to see through them and cut Mylar bubble insulation (two layer is best) to fit your windows if you want max. insulation. Cost you a whole heck of a lot less!

I agree... sort of. While RV dual pane windows have a low R-value compared to those in a house, they still provide some extra insulation. Where they are most useful is in preventing condensation and reducing noise.

The 3M crystalline film is heads and shoulders above previous film technology - and doesn't interfere with cell phones, TV, Wi-Fi, etc., like the metallic films do. The 3M crystalline film for our fifth wheel cost $1,550 installed - about $200 more than dual pane windows would have from the factory (and the dual pane windows would have added 300 lbs. to the rig - contrary to a previous post). The crystalline film is MUCH better at heat rejection than dual pane windows - slightly less so with cold in the winter. We still have Reflectix ("bubble foil") insulation panels cut to fit the big windows that we use in extremely cold weather.

Rob

Dual and triple pane windows in homes have an air gap of roughly 1/2 inch in order to provide meaningful insulation. Dual pane windows for RVs do NOT have enough air gap to provide anything close to the same. Their nothing but hype and a way to get more money out of a buyer. Better to use film if you want to see through them and cut Mylar bubble insulation (two layer is best) to fit your windows if you want max. insulation. Cost you a whole heck of a lot less!

ol Bombero-JC wrote:

Lexx wrote:
I forgot to mention that our house has the "strongest" gas filled double pane windows. We get 110F summers here. I found that even with these "heavy duty" double pane windows, the hot sun still just streams through STRONGLY. It wasn't until we put the mesh sun screen material mounted outside of the windows that we could tolerate the amount of heat transmitted through the glass.

I've seen the Huper Optik window film demonstration where they put a heat lamp on the other side of a coated piece of glass. The amount of heat that it cuts down is most impressive.

I understand about the noise issue with double panes. But with double panes, window film will void the warranty because the heat rejection of the film will expand the gas between the panes and blow the seals.

Being that I'm primarily interested in managing the heat from the hot summers, I'm leaning towards single pane windows and the solar film. I'm just not confident that double panes will do that much for heat control given my experience with relatively expensive double pane residential windows.

Why even bother with *opinions* on a forum, especially when "facts" are hard to come by? ..:@

Results can go either way depending on the number of respondents, which is a very, VERY small fraction of the "users"...:S

Think you had already made your decision anyway - So choose what YOU believe is best for YOU and go for it..:C

~

Agree with you ol Bombero, sounds like he wanted to know about double pane versus single pane, but in reality had already made up his mind and didn’t really need to post about double pane windows at all. Didn’t make a lot of sense.

Jim

Exterior window awnings.

Lexx wrote:
I forgot to mention that our house has the "strongest" gas filled double pane windows. We get 110F summers here. I found that even with these "heavy duty" double pane windows, the hot sun still just streams through STRONGLY. It wasn't until we put the mesh sun screen material mounted outside of the windows that we could tolerate the amount of heat transmitted through the glass.

I've seen the Huper Optik window film demonstration where they put a heat lamp on the other side of a coated piece of glass. The amount of heat that it cuts down is most impressive.

I understand about the noise issue with double panes. But with double panes, window film will void the warranty because the heat rejection of the film will expand the gas between the panes and blow the seals.

Being that I'm primarily interested in managing the heat from the hot summers, I'm leaning towards single pane windows and the solar film. I'm just not confident that double panes will do that much for heat control given my experience with relatively expensive double pane residential windows.

Why even bother with *opinions* on a forum, especially when "facts" are hard to come by? ..:@

Results can go either way depending on the number of respondents, which is a very, VERY small fraction of the "users"...:S

Think you had already made your decision anyway - So choose what YOU believe is best for YOU and go for it..:C

~

I forgot to mention that our house has the "strongest" gas filled double pane windows. We get 110F summers here. I found that even with these "heavy duty" double pane windows, the hot sun still just streams through STRONGLY. It wasn't until we put the mesh sun screen material mounted outside of the windows that we could tolerate the amount of heat transmitted through the glass.

I've seen the Huper Optik window film demonstration where they put a heat lamp on the other side of a coated piece of glass. The amount of heat that it cuts down is most impressive.

I understand about the noise issue with double panes. But with double panes, window film will void the warranty because the heat rejection of the film will expand the gas between the panes and blow the seals.

Being that I'm primarily interested in managing the heat from the hot summers, I'm leaning towards single pane windows and the solar film. I'm just not confident that double panes will do that much for heat control given my experience with relatively expensive double pane residential windows.