720Deere wrote:
Atom Ant wrote:
john&bet wrote:
My opinion is that there should be no such thing as a 1 ton srw. Thier tires are the same so thier contact point with the road is the same as a 3/4 ton. JMHO.
?? Let's take it a step further, let's just eliminate the 3/4 ton. Why de-rate a perfectly good SRW 1-ton with lighter axles and springs ;)
Exactly! The 1 ton SRW is everything that a 3/4 ton should be. With the half tons creeping up on the 3/4, the decision to buy a 3/4 over a 1 ton never made any sense to me. As far as the tires go, most everybody has a 20" wheel option these days and those tires ratings are more in line with what the rear axle is capable of. Not sure what the contact patch has to do with it.
If you eliminated the SRW 1 ton, you would force a lot of people that don't need it into driving a dually. No thanks, I'll stick with the more legally capable version of the SRW truck.
If you had looked at a 2013 Ram 3500 SRW and compared to a 2013 Ram 2500, there would be a BIG difference...all new frame, front and rear suspension and could even order with the Aisin tranny....the 2500, though specs were raised, was basically the same as the 2012...so, in reality, there was a pretty big difference between the 2013 Ram 3500 SRW truck and the Ram 2013 2500...The big difference also is rear axle weight carrying capacity...ie, util I read something differently, most 2500's don't have the "payload" a 3500 SRW truck has...