GordonThree wrote:
I thought the 2nd amendment recognized the right to form a militia for the security of the state and those people in the militia have the right to have and bear arms.
There is a lot of debate about what the writers of the Constitution were actually thinking when they conceived of and wrote it. If you want to think the 2nd Amendment was written to mean this militia was intended to have the same weapons as the federal military then you would have to think the common citizenary would be allowed to posses F-22 fighters, nuclear armament, etc. in the 1700's the militia consisted of men between the ages of 18 and I think 49. And that militia was to be well regulated. So does that mean only men of those ages should be allowed to own weapons? I don't know. A lot of questions. I don't have a problem with folks being able to own weapons. But those weapons should and the owners should be well regulated. As to the OP's original questions; I wouldn't take your weapons into Canada. Many people have given you several options. Weigh those options and hopefully you will make the right decision. Happy travels.