A macerating toilet
This would make life easier in a Class B. I think the low profile runs about $1000. Not that much if your buying a new $100,000 + Class B. Maybe it's not too late for Davydd to upgrade his new Advanc...
Forum Discussion
Arizona Kid wrote:Bumpyroad wrote:avanti wrote:Arizona Kid wrote:
Obviously you didn't read the post. :S It's a macerator toilet.
Well, I, at least, DID read the post. And I, too, am wondering what the principle is here. What exactly are the advantages of this toilet? I have no interest whatsoever in performing a gravity-fed dump (except in an emergency) when I have a fully-sealed, germ and odor free macerator dump system. Why do I need a second macerator at the toilet?
my question also. two things to go wrong?
bumpy
Or less to go wrong, no more holding tank problems, everything is liquid. They use the macerator toilets on ships, and boats with good success. They have also been installed in Class A's.
Anyway I just thought it was interesting, some people find fault with anything that gets posted these days.
This was recently talked about on a Roadtrek group. The macerating toilet combined with the permanent macerator dump system would supposedly eliminate the problems that are encountered with the permanent macerator and the tanks sensors. The black tank would then hold only liquids. Of course, there are other things that will foul a macerator including hair going down a drain and wrapping around the impeller. It is an interesting idea - but then why not just have a gravity system that is easily accessible with the ability to add an add on macerator - this resolves all problems except false sensor readings.
