Am I seeking the impossible?
I've been looking at Class C's and a few B+'s. Almost all of them have the overcab bed which to me is wasted space and the cabover part of the house is added drag for no gain in usability. I will be u...
Forum Discussion
pnichols wrote:
The Phoenix Cruiser is one example: Why not have their small, single fiberglass piece, and streamlined cabover area still be a single bed - as an option? That way one would still get some gas mileage benefit, but have the option of two permanent sleeping locations for flexibility - the corner bed in the rear being kindof a queen and the cabover bed being kindof a single.
IMHO, the name of the game in any well designed RV is flexibility - with as much as possible double or multiple use of it's layout configurations and always a Plan B on how things can get used by the owner.
The reason we're partial to the Phoenix Cruiser is the fact that the maker is willing to configure the interior to your specs. They aren't one of these mass produced assembly line companies where you're expected to just accept what they put on the model lot. If you want these things, ask Phoenix Cruiser and they will do their best to accommodate your wishes. Their customer service is outstanding.
