Forum Discussion
Lantley
Sep 20, 2014Nomad
Honestly if the CG posted the rule than the OP has no valid gripe.
It all boils down to the OP disagreed with the guest policy.
Truth is the CG is liable for anyone on their property.
The CG pays a significant insurance liability premium. Therefore the CG collects a fee for everyone that enters their property. I see no issue other than the OP somehow thinks they should be exempt from the posted rules.
I do commend the OP for deciding to leave. There are plenty of CG's that have rulers I disagree with and as a result I don't stay there. Nevertheless I respect the CG owners right to set the rules as they see fit.
In the end it's their CG their rules.
I can decide to accept the rules and stay or find the rules unacceptable and stay elsewhere.
It all boils down to the OP disagreed with the guest policy.
Truth is the CG is liable for anyone on their property.
The CG pays a significant insurance liability premium. Therefore the CG collects a fee for everyone that enters their property. I see no issue other than the OP somehow thinks they should be exempt from the posted rules.
I do commend the OP for deciding to leave. There are plenty of CG's that have rulers I disagree with and as a result I don't stay there. Nevertheless I respect the CG owners right to set the rules as they see fit.
In the end it's their CG their rules.
I can decide to accept the rules and stay or find the rules unacceptable and stay elsewhere.
About Motorhome Group
38,706 PostsLatest Activity: Feb 01, 2025