Best class A lengths for national parks?
We have been looking at class A's...our first RV of any sort, and are totally confused!! We love the livability of over 35', but I have heard that the shorter lengths are better. We are really torn!...
Forum Discussion
huntdooly wrote:
Thanks everyone, for all of your helpful answers! LOL...It almost sounds like one needs a popup in tow for those tiny campsites!
If you're talking about the designated "campgrounds" in the national forest/parks, these are just average standard campground configurations. We're not talking some deep woods trekking. The only issue with size within the campground would be availability of a spot that has the length you need. As with anything related to RV size, you just have to know where your going and determine if the places you plan on going and the type of camping you want to do, are accessible. A long RV is still able to access over 95% of the established national park/forest designated campgrounds.
Now, if talking disperse back-country boondocking, in that case, smaller is better as you have access to more places. But if the majority of the time your staying at a campground (with or without services), length is seldom an issue.
