Bill.Satellite wrote:
OhhWell wrote:
Bill.Satellite wrote:
Yep, there's the "let's sue everyone" response.
Really... Can you point out where I said to sue everybody?
There is a reason we have a court system. If you go through reasonable channels and cannot get resolution and are certain you are correct, you can go to court and a judge will determine who is right.
There would be nothing wrong with filing in civil if a repair facility not only didn't fix your engine right but neglectfully damaged your radiator and overlooked a more serious problem that caused complete engine failure AND refused to take any responsibility.
Now, if one were suggesting to inflate the "lawsuit" for emotional distress etc., then I could understand your comment. I'm sure if this happened to you, you would just let it go right? And there should be no repercussions for a repair shop completely botching a job and causing further damage right?
That would have some teeth if the person had even spoken to the repair folks about what happened and why. Instead, someone said their engine is dead, they want to sue someone and you agree.
I don't!
I agree that the owner needs to contact the repair shop. I have mentioned that.
As to the simplification you posed of the whole thread and my participation in it, they questioned whether the original repair shop should be responsible for some of the damage and I put forth that from what was told they sounded like they were and if they did not step up, a civil suite would probably be in order or at least the only recourse.
But that's alright. Some people will only hear what they want to hear regardless of what is actually said. I include myself in that statement at times.