Dakzuki wrote:
burlmart wrote:
Interesting C news, indeed.
Too bad this thread was yanked out of the C forum so quickly -- might be needing all the Cs they can get now.
Maybe because it's a class A......
On a Class C chassis. Even Thor states so.
As I recall from RV.net protocol for Class Bs, "if it started as ______, that's what it is"
Also, for all who justify classification by looks, I can produce dozens of B look-a-likes that were not considered in class w/ conversion vans on RV.net.
RVIA's non-existwnt chassis rules were cited as authoritative support. When I could get a more considered response from a moderator, as I recall, he simply said "Whatever, we will classify them by RV.net rules"