How Do We Classify an RUV?
Saw my first one today. Thought it was a new Sprinter based brand, but the wheelbase was too long. Going inside the steering wheel emblem was Ford! They called it a "hybrid" "Recreational Utility V...
Forum Discussion
burlmart wrote:
Also, for all who justify classification by looks, I can produce dozens of B look-a-likes that were not considered in class w/ conversion vans on RV.net.
Not that it matters to anyone but me, but I consider the rigs chassis origin to determine classification. Based on many other posts here, so do many of rv.net members.
* Stripped chassis = A,
* cutaway chassis = C and
* full bodied van = B
regardless of how much "mechanics" is shared among the chassis.
burlmart wrote:
RVIA's non-existwnt chassis rules were cited as authoritative support. When I could get a more considered response from a moderator, as I recall, he simply said "Whatever, we will classify them by RV.net rules"
You should "let go" of whatever has traumatized you over RV classifications. It can't be good for you and seems to irritate rv.net members.
