wa8yxm wrote:
BUT if you have wheels NOT breaking (As in a free wheeling "Trailer" and I put trailer in quotes because it need not be a Trailer) then the math is much much much more complex and the skid distance is much farther.. 1/3 (as US gear says) perhaps not but that is my source.
And knowning that as any high school physics student SHOULD knwo. It is reckless to NOT have aux brakes though I'll admit if you have like a 10 to 1 weight ratio ... the diference won't be that great.
As I had mentioned in my first post, I use an aux brake BUT, and this is most important, it is NOT legally required in any of the 40+ States that I contacted. States like California DO NOT require an aux brake but you must be able to stop your rig within a given distance, ie stop within 50' at 20 MPH, (which is just an example and not the actual requirements).
For those that believe that an aux brake is legally required, or, as some have mentioned, "common sense", I assume that when your aux brake fails, which it will at some point, that you will abandon your toad at the side of the road, or leave it behind in an RV park, until you can get your aux brake fixed. :B
Here is the link to California DMV and if you scroll down it talks about towing behind an RV. At no time does it mention that you must have brakes on the toad.
Cannot do the link but just do a search of "California DMV, Driving your RV safely" and you will find the website.
Now if you check any site from any manufacturer of any braking system, they will ALL mention that you must have one of their systems to be legal in California, and most any other States. Total BS.