Utilization measure for class a use
When I used to work, I was on the lookout for measures that would compare how well my portion of the business compared with other companies. Purpose was to id topics where we were not in the first qua...
Forum Discussion
Effy wrote:
Struggling with the point of the post. In your job you looked to leverage competitive advantages to yield higher performance (you didn't say if this was tactile performance or fiscal or both by proxy). I think most business models run this way. I am not sure how this correlates to cost of MH ownership by day and it's fluctuation by changing MH's. Nothing cost effective about MH ownership at all. It's all loss mitigation. Buy newer, cost of ownership goes up, primarily due to depreciation. Staying in your current rig, the loss curve flattens out as depreciation declines year over year. But there really is no analysis that can be done on a competitive advantage to yield "more" anything out of an RV sans throwing more money at it, or liquidating. Maybe I missed something.
+1 Owning a motor home is neither a corporation nor a profitable operation. What are you comparing your cost to? If you are measuring your RV to the performance of another Rv to find out which one is more cost effective, then you may have something. If you are just trying to prove that owning a motor home is expensive, there are much easier ways of doing it, just look at your bank account.
