Forum Discussion

rockhillmanor's avatar
rockhillmanor
Explorer II
Aug 08, 2013

Banning Tethering can affect how you RV w/your dog_VERY long

Yes this is very long.
If you have no interest in it please click on to another topic! :B

When the bus started rolling out a few years back when the aspca started the actions of banning certain breeds and on to banning even breeds that didn't warrant it, everyone thought it was the best idea ever.
I'm sure by now all of you have finally seen how that affected your ability to use CG's while RV'ing with your well behaved dogs who sadly fall on that list.

Well.......
The tethering buss is out of the station and steamrolling. I've only been following Florida's but each month another county jumps on this and is banning tethering because of the pressure from the ASPCA. ASPCA reps and animal activists are organizing and are showing up at town hall meetings across the whole US.

ASPCA and animal activists feel tethering is extreme cruelty to animals. They are putting an all out mission on this one.

Start attending the town hall meetings in your state and county and stop them from banning tethering if you ever want to be able to tie your dog out at a CG or anywhere for that matter.

They are not going to advertise these bills in your local newspaper, they just bring it up in a meeting, vote and pass it. County officials don't have a clue what it is all about, only that ASPCA is sending representatives to town hall meetings across the US and pressuring them to pass it, knowing full well these meetings don't always have the entire town there. If no one is there to question it's validity these officials are just passing these laws for banning tethering. They are purposely hitting at the county/town level because of the ease of having them voted on right then and there.

The ASPCA is pushing that tethering a dog out 24 hours a day is cruel.
The tethering laws DO NOT distinguish between 24 hours a day or 1 hour or 5 minutes. It will ban tethering a dog for 'any' reason, 'any' length of time.

The in your face with pictures of dogs tied up full time in a deplorable looking back yard tactic is so that the pet owners who keep their dogs inside will get all riled up about tethering a dog 24 hours a day so that they all gather and rally 'for' this ban. Not knowing the full ramification of this law.

Yes most of us do not like to see the dog that is tied in the back yard and that is his entire life. Yes that's sad, but this tethering ban will encompass so much more. This tethering ban is going to allow them to come on your property without a warrant if they see a dog tied up. THIS is the more important reason why we need to stop these bans.

As RV'ing pet owners let's not let this one slip thru like the banned breeds law did. Or you can forget about being able to tie your dog up while you are eating lunch at the picnic table outside your rv at your campsite :(

28 Replies

  • Go Dogs wrote:
    The ASPCA does not promote BSL:
    "It is, therefore, the ASPCA’s position to oppose any state or local law to regulate or ban dogs based on breed. The ASPCA recognizes that dangerous dogs pose a community problem requiring serious attention. However, in light of the absence of scientific data indicating the efficacy of breed-specific laws, and the unfair and inhumane targeting of responsible pet guardians and their dogs that inevitably results when these laws are enacted, the ASPCA instead favors effective enforcement of a combination of breed-neutral laws that hold reckless dog guardians accountable for their dogs’ aggressive behavior." Per their website.


    Thank you for posting this.
  • The ASPCA does not promote BSL:
    "It is, therefore, the ASPCA’s position to oppose any state or local law to regulate or ban dogs based on breed. The ASPCA recognizes that dangerous dogs pose a community problem requiring serious attention. However, in light of the absence of scientific data indicating the efficacy of breed-specific laws, and the unfair and inhumane targeting of responsible pet guardians and their dogs that inevitably results when these laws are enacted, the ASPCA instead favors effective enforcement of a combination of breed-neutral laws that hold reckless dog guardians accountable for their dogs’ aggressive behavior." Per their website.
  • So is a drag considered teathering?

    Livestock Guardian Dog Won't Stay Home


    To fix this problem one needs to go back and teach the dog that under no circumstances can they cross fence lines and while doing that help re-establish the bond with the livestock. Retrain the dog to electric fences or alternatively, you may opt for attaching an object to the dogs collar that is light enough to drag but awkward enough to prevent the dog from crossing fences or going too far. A common object is a small rubber tire.A triangle collar will also deter a dog who slips through the fence.

    source: Ranching with Sheep: Common Dog Behaviors Witnessed with LGD's
  • Our city has an anti-tethering ordinance. I'm not really sure what it says, but I think the reasoning is to give some enforcement teeth to dogs that become a nuisance when tethered outside.

    I too would like to see the evidence where there is a orchestrated effort by any group pushing this agenda.

    Like Dog Folks said, I think they are mostly aimed at tethering unattended, a good thing in my opinion.

    Every year or two we see a dog that has severe life threatening injuries (or has died) from consequences of being tethered. The most serious was a dog that hanged itself when jumping over a fence while tethered. Owner mistake, obviously. But those with heat related issues because of lack of water and shade are pretty common. Granted, those heat related issues can be as bad with dogs confined in a run or fenced yard.

    While extreme bans on tethering are probably unreasonable, the idea of restriction isn't totally without merit. But, how do you set limits and enforce??

    Doug, DVM
  • Unattended tethering is wrong for any length of time. I would support the bill that bans it. I also urge you to support the bill.
  • Yes, I'd like to see links, too.

    All the passed and proposed tethering bans I've read clearly state that dogs aren't to be tethered when the owner isn't present. In other words, tying the dog out while you're right there is fine. And since that's exactly what almost all campground rules already state . . . . I really don't see tethering bans having any impact whatsoever on RV'ers.
  • From the other side: Short term tie outs are O.K. but how do you enforce it?

    You would have to develop a system that would hold up in court to "time" how long the dog has been outside. Animal control officers would become meter maids.

    In Florida, you can safely tether a dog outside IF the animal has fresh water, and shade available. The problem, from my experience, is that the animal has neither, most of the time.

    Yes, there is a movement to ban outside tethering, but in most cases it is UNATTENDED tethering that is being banned, and that is overall, a good thing.