Been comparing dog foods again as I'm trying to find a less expensive alternative to the Blue Basics we've been using. Blue Basics contains lots of ingredients like blueberries, cranberries, yucca, peas, chicory root, kelp, and a few other things. This is in addition to the more "standard" type of stuff. This is their formula designed for dogs with food sensitivities. Do these things really add that much nutrition to the food?
Those ingredients are in the bits that are 'added' to the kibble.
Are they necessary? No. Are they beneficial? IMHO yes.
BUT, they do add sugar which is of course is not listed on the label. So you have to be aware of that if you have a diabetic dog or where added sugar poses a problem.
I have been going around and around with Blue. They have substantially decreased the amount of the bits in the food. AND they just about completely eliminated all the bits in the 50 lb bag. When I buy a bag of dog food I want ALL the ingredients to be in there!!
Those bits are the most expensive ingredient to the manufacturer. So I guess they are backing off on it to increase their profit line.
No surprise there. Every single dog food that gets popular real fast.....the company starts changing the ingredients to make more money while they are on the gravy train. :(
Great Life is the first to use those bits and that food was REAL high priced which is why I switched to Blue.
Next letter goes to AAFCO they were approved WITH all the bits in the food at X amount percent and now they are lowering the amount and totally eliminating them in the larger bags. Time to make them accountable. And BTW they have repeatedly refused to tell me WHERE their food is processed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8574/e857470a4b40da5a84a0883d18b55bb29c787acd" alt=""
:B