Times Up, Told You So, DirecTV is Dead

Bill.Satellite wrote:

CFerguson wrote:

Bill.Satellite wrote:
Bill is even easier, more appropriate and more polite but you don't seem interested in either of the last 2.

More interested in them than you are of looking at the Facts in the links i have posted. Believing something because you have chosen to put Satellite in your name doesnt make you an expert on it. More data (in the guise of knowledgeable sources), less opinion supports a position. Or at least try to understand the tech of Starlink. I'd be glad to help you understand any of it youre having trouble with if youd ask.

I see you are simply going to continue to insult be so there is no further point trying to have an actual discussion. You appear to be the only one here saying you know it all despite the service not existing as of today (other than the Beta).
When the service becomes available we will finally be able to discuss reality and not how the service will work "on paper".
Price, speed, hardware, installation, mobility......so many questions.
Oh by the way, you may continue your insults but I will no longer respond to or acknowledge your pathetic attempts at degradation in hope of furthering your own self-worth.

The thread is entitled Times Up, Told You So, DirecTV is Dead. Speculation as to the reason why led us to one possibility, the looming dominance of orbital internet driven by the same model as cell towers.
You denied many aspects that have already been proven by the (small) constellation in orbit.
You deny proven speeds that beat your pet ideas of land based hardwired systems.
You refuse all offers to help you understand the math of the entire discussion.
Sure glad the Musks, Fords, Edisons et al didnt have that attitude. Being entrenched in old tech is a sure way to be left behind.

And my offer to help you understand what is happening with Starlink stands. Here, a dedicated thread, or PM. I really think you'll embrace it once you set aside any preconceived notions.