ncrowley wrote:
I would change the antenna. I have a dome Rayzar Automatic antenna and I really like it.
SoundGuy wrote:
Would like to ask - by any chance is your Winegard Rayzar Automatic a replacement for a Winegard Sensar IV and if so do you find it as sensitive as the IV as Winegard claims?
ncrowley wrote:
I cannot compare the two antennas since I have not used the two types of antennas in the same place and compared the signals. All I can tell you is that so far, it has found plenty of stations in the places we have used it and the picture quality is very good.
"Picture quality" has nothing to do with the type of antenna receiving the signal. Rather, I'd like to establish whether the Rayzar Automatic is comparable to the Sensar IV in terms of signal sensitivity. Certainly the Rayzar would be more convenient but if it's sensitivity isn't on par with what is arguably the best out there in RV OTA antennas, the Sensar IV, then I'd not make the switch, especially considering how pricey the Rayzar is. Thanks for reply though. :)