20K and 2.5 yr fight secures a win over HOA for RV parking

bid_time wrote:

smkettner wrote:
2' variance does seem reasonable.

2012Coleman wrote:
This doesn't say that RV's are not allowed to be parked at homes, it states that they must be 5 feet from a certain point - AKA setback. Their RV extended into that area by a mere 2.5 feet and some curmudgeon complained. So while I agree that they could have gotten a generator, the issue was about 2.5 feet which IMO is where the total BS is coming from.

If 2' is reasonable then why not 3', and if 3' is reasonable why not 4', and if 4' is reasonable .... etc., etc., etc. That's why zoning administrators never make an exception for "reasonable". It's a never ending street. If the code says 6', then 6' it is, not 6' 1". And let's not forget what someone else mentioned, they could have bought a shorter RV.

The variance is 2'. I agree if they now apply for a 3' variance to get a larger RV it could be denied.