20K and 2.5 yr fight secures a win over HOA for RV parking
Click for Story
Forum Discussion
I think most people are aware of the logistics of moving a person with such needs. But again, no where in the article is there any mention that the RV was needed for transportation for the boy. Per the article, they wanted the RV parked at the home "to provide life-sustaining support for Joey in the event their home loses electrical power". The article then says "The Cronleys not only want to park the RV at their home, they also use it when Joey accompanies his parents on trips out of town."
There is nothing there about "evacuation in case of disaster", etc., nor about the inability to otherwise transport the boy safely.
Now, was that part of the court case? Possibly. But without it being mentioned in the article, we really can't assume that is the case.
And while I sympathize with the special circumstances of such disabilities, and I do not like HOAs, I don't have any more information than the article offers on which to base an opinion - and I find that article to be lacking in many ways, as well as to be poorly written and potentially biased and possibly sensationalized.
There is nothing there about "evacuation in case of disaster", etc., nor about the inability to otherwise transport the boy safely.
Now, was that part of the court case? Possibly. But without it being mentioned in the article, we really can't assume that is the case.
And while I sympathize with the special circumstances of such disabilities, and I do not like HOAs, I don't have any more information than the article offers on which to base an opinion - and I find that article to be lacking in many ways, as well as to be poorly written and potentially biased and possibly sensationalized.
