Turtle n Peeps wrote:
JRscooby wrote:
Last I heard, Sweden is having more cases then countries around.
Another thought about laid off medical workers. If the hospitals can not get the equipment to protect them might be better not have them come to work.
Heard from who? Link please if you have it.
Cuomo WAY overestimates the need for ventilators. Gives them away to other states.
So it looks like Cuomo's gloom and doom ventilator need didn't pan out for him. That's a good thing.
We now know the computer modeling they used sucked about as bad as Windows Vista.
It's beginning to look like CDC's 60K death toll is going to be close to correct. It's good to see they are finally starting to use better modeling because the last one sucked!
The story about Sweden was broadcast by BBC.
And about the defect in modeling; I thought the outcome was predicted based on how people where acting. Change the actions, the outcome will change.
fj12ryder wrote:
"What we really need to do is have as many people as possible stay home but protect their income."
A good idea, but seems difficult to actually put into operation. No work=No income.
Slight change; No work=No income, unless you are rich. Somehow what claims to be the richest country in the world has no problem handing the people that have more money than they can ever spend more, but the thought of giving people enough to buy food and pay rent is pure evil. What system of morality is that from?