Forum Discussion
toedtoes
Jan 07, 2015Explorer III
rjxj wrote:
Here is another issue. Suppose the park owner was to go onto campsite reviews and notice that the reviews of his park have people mentioning the fact that when they come to stay they seem to have to tell someone about their dog being left in the trailer barking. About the only thing the park owner could do it that point is wonder why he's not getting any complaints about it or he may have changed his policies and his emphasis on that issue at check in. Hes not getting feed back because the majority didnt listen at check in when they say if you have any problems let us know we're it says on the rule sheet if you have any issues bring them to the park management. If the management is involved with resolving the problem he may be able to even weed out some people who would tend to continue that behavior. If they dont come back to this park then it would be more enjoyable for you and you wouldn't have to go deal with it.
OK. So, using this example, you find it unfair for someone to post negative comments about a park without giving the park owner the opportunity to fix it first.
So why would you NOT give that same opportunity to the dog owner - giving them a chance to fix it before taking it to the next level?
For me, I believe in giving a person or company the chance to correct a small problem before turning it into a big problem. Usually, I find that it really wasn't a problem after all.
About RV Tips & Tricks
Looking for advice before your next adventure? Look no further.25,101 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 14, 2025