ryoung wrote:
I would think that since no HOA was established when the developer gave up his interest in the community, the covenants are no longer effective or enforceable.
There MUST be an organization in place that contains in its bylaws or articles of incorporation, the stated covenants in question. Consequently, no HOA in place, no enforceable restrictions.
ryoung
There you go thinking...
Before I dropped hundreds of thousands of dollars on a house, I would talk to a lawyer like OP said he was going to do, or maybe has.
I can't imagine going up in front of a judge and saying "Judge, the guys on RV.NET said it would be okay and the covenants are not enforceable.
Something tells me that wouldn't go over very well (grin)
Mike
