rk911 wrote:
ScottG wrote:
...It's such a minor thing to ask of their guests and it could be it came about for a pretty good reason.
and that's the inherent problem with all of these well-meaning, nanny rules. individually they're all minor things but collectively we're being buried by these minor things. my wife and I are perfectly able to care for ourselves. want to encourage helmets, fine. but the decision is, or should be, ours.
You're correct, just like the decision to wear a helmet or not is yours the rules of the CG that you must follow are theirs. I can even envision a helmet requirement being a condition of some level of insurance coverage that the CG owners want to have.
Larry