rockportrocket wrote:
Vulcaneer, you are correct, it is against the law to charge one customer one price, then another a different price for the same services. The Pitman act alone states that in the supreme court case. Again you are correct that in the act of whether the return on risk for the lawsuit is minor compared to the cost.
I will state again, what the OP said is illegal, if taken to court.
Note to WPO, I made pretty good living for 40 years as an attorney, I don't try to tell you how to run a rv park and you should do the same.
I think that we both could agree that simply passing the Bar does not qualify for expertise in all disciplines of the law. Neither of us would be likely to hire our Tax Attorney to defend our criminal charges past tax matters.
Extending "discounts" to a preferred group of consumers as a result of membership into a class, whether paid or as a result of prior purchases, has been successfully defended multiple times in both State and Federal Court. Follow the history of Sam's Club for precedence.
