Conversion Vans not allowed at some RV Parks?

mike-s wrote:
That straw man is dead. The discussion is about the RVIA seal, not requirements for code compliance. Nothing you've cited has shown the RVIA seal is worth anything.

Ummm, no, actually, the OP was;

Deb and Ed M wrote:
I've been happily turning a new Transit T250, medium-high roof van into a "travel van" to get us back and forth from FL, and to do some sightseeing and weekend camping.

I read on another forum, that some RV Parks won't allow "converted vans".

Are we going to pull into a park, only to have someone turn us away because we have a "conversion"??

They didn't mention RVIA at all, several other posters did, including myself, because on a percentage basis I doubt you'd need the fingers of one hand to count how many commercially produced RV's bear a certification seal that is anything BUT an RVIA seal.

But since that much discussed seal does nothing but refer to the legally required standards by NFPA and others it's kind of like saying 'you can't call that a "Kleenex" because it wasn't made by Kimberly-Clark'.

Do you ask for a "cellulose-based generic facial tissue" when you have a runny nose?

Now, one more time........


IF YOU'RE NOT GOING TO DO ANYTHING BUT LOOK FOR A REASON TO ARGUE, STOP POSTING.

You've been shown chapter & verse (over & over & over again) where & why life safety standards are required, quit trying to nit-pick over why you still think you're right, that ship sank pages ago.