Do we need another brake system ??

Effy wrote:
Yes it's a good idea. But the doom and gloom about always being at fault and sued if you don't is all conjecture. Devil's advocate, I have yet to see any suit where the defendant's lack of a supplimental brake system in their MH cost them a case. one.

this type of rationale always amuses me. when a civil case drags on in court for a year or two and the jury finally awards a large sum to the damaged party, what do you expect, a headline in the Washington Compost saying "multi million award due to no braking system"? all I can assure you is that if somebody towing a toad rear ends me that is one of the first issues I will raise with the investigating officer. certainly contributory negligence could be argued.
bumpy