DallasSteve wrote:
TechWriter
You wrote "Unless you have cash to spare, I don't suggest full timing for anyone under 65 who has to purchase their own individual health insurance."
How is that any worse than being retired and not yet reached 65 and not living in an RV? Does living in a house or apartment give you some magic solution to health care? I don't think the RV or living in it full time is the problem.
If you don't move anywhere, there shouldn't be a difference. In fact you could move to a state with better health care coverage.
However, the Kiplinger article was about full timing
and moving around:
"why not sell the house, buy a recreational vehicle and see the country?"
