RambleOnNW wrote:
Lets see some links showing your claims to be true. Authoratative links not from some enviro greenie source.
Dude thinks the prestigious Forbes (est. 1917) and Scientific American (est. 1845) are environmental magazines. Clearly we have nothing further to discuss. Welcome to the Hydrogen Economy.
Scientific American, and I was a subscriber for decades, went woke a number of years ago and has been dropping readers in massive numbers ever since. Forbes is a news magazine and while better than most, just publishes what its writers bring to it.
