Wow... this could have far-reaching implications. Quoting from the cited article,
"The court said the law was unconstitutional because its ambiguous wording does not make clear what conduct would constitute a violation and "criminalizes innocent behavior." "
I can see how they might rewrite the law to remove the 'ambiguous wording'. But the part about "criminalizing innocent behavior"??? Those are interesting words for a legal nit-picker. They just might be grounds for challenging every municipal, state, and federal park's rules about 'park closes at dark'.
Heck, that decision might even over-rule things like the Blue Ridge Parkway's rules about car & RV sleeping in overlooks. Yeah, that's probably stretching it too far....
Jim, "Worrying works! 90% of what I worry about never happens."
