Forum Discussion
JaxDad
Apr 11, 2015Explorer III
LarryJM wrote:
Yep that is the risk you take with the air only method and something I don't think JaxDad appreciates when he thinks you can be 100% effective using air and if you do have an issue it's because you did something wrong or didn't do it good enough.
Actually, by definition, if you have water freeze damage after blowing, you HAVE done something wrong or didn't do it good enough. Otherwise you'd have ZERO damage.
LarryJM wrote:
What he fails to provide is a fool proof method of determining of when you have been effective enough not to have an issue. It's a pure guessing game on what air pressure to use, how long to blow out the lines, how much time between multiple blow outs so left over water settles and is then blow out and how do you tell with 100% assurance you have in fact removed enough water to prevent problems.
You blow until there's no water, not even aerosol mist coming out, period. That might be 1 minute, it might be 5 minutes.
That's pretty simple. Zero water equals zero freeze damage. It's not complicated. The irrigation industry has been doing it for nearly a century now, you don't see them digging up golf courses and other expanses of fine turf looking for burst lines because it doesn't happen.
About RV Tips & Tricks
Looking for advice before your next adventure? Look no further.25,113 PostsLatest Activity: Feb 22, 2025