darsben1 wrote:
westernrvparkowner wrote:
In recent weeks, RVparkreviews.com has started posting all the one and done reviews from the past few months. This is a change from their previous policy of requiring 3 reviews before a review is posted. Many of these one off reviews are easy to find, just look for the one and two star reviews in the most recently posted section.
Some of them are unbelievable. One of my favorites posted today. A park in Nashville was bashed because it had changed ownership. The poster claimed they had been visiting for years. Now the new owners have the audacity to not know every returning guest by name. As a matter of fact, they don't even know what sites those returning guests prefer.
Apparently they new owners have a green thumb, however. In the span of one year the trees have grown to the point they block the roads, block satellite service etc. Overnight, the sites have gotten completely out of level, developed deep ruts and otherwise become virtually unusable. Bad new owners to say the least.
The reviewer is going to change their go to park in Nashville because of the ownership change. Sure hope their new park has psychic owners who know the names of everyone, even before they meet them.
This is a serious situation that needs to be addressed. Some people cannot accept change. Maybe there should be a law that parks cannot be sold without the permission of the previous guests.
Please the people who posted the Nashville review have 45 reviews under their belt. Definitely not one and done.
However, the review is a poorly done review
Found the review in question as well and yes it's a post coloured by a bias over the sale most likely. Basically, it's the type of review I'd ignore along with the "It's great!" and "I hated it!"reviews with no reasonable explanation of why.
