GMandJM wrote:
For the record though, count me amongst those who DO want to know if a park has recently been purchased by a Medical Marijuana Support Group. If posts are deferred for that, please reconsider.
It's probably better for everyone if posts discuss objective observations. Therefore, if ownership of a park by a particular group results in what you consider objectionable behaviors then those should be noted (for example, distributing free "product samples").
That way we don't get into a gray area by commenting on the kinds of people who own a park. I doubt you would consider it appropriate to comment if a particular church owned an RV park, unless that church's practices affected your enjoyment of it. The same thing is true of the marijuana folks. They might own it and you'd never know it if they simply ran it as a business. It's only when they cross the line and their "beliefs" affect customers that it is appropriate to comment on in a review.
Joel