RV Park Review deferred
So I posted a review of my recent experience to RV park review about the park I didn't receive my assigned site in and they deferred it saying that it was too much personal information included about ...
Forum Discussion
alnal326 wrote:
So I posted a review of my recent experience to RV park review about the park I didn't receive my assigned site in and they deferred it saying that it was too much personal information included about my experience and I needed to rewrite it and sum down my bad experience. The good part I wrote about the park they liked. Now how do you sum down an experience and still get across what you are saying? Is it even worth it? Why write it if you can't tell the whole truth.
Honestly, I totally agree with you. The NGIC (new guy in charge) at RVPR says he's somewhat willing to entertain the ever-so-remote possibility that there may be issues with censoring reviews and he has asked that anyone who has had reviews "deferred" unreasonably contact him.
Here's what he wrote in reply when I said there had been complaints: "Once again, I look forward to you providing some clear examples that you have heard from RV.net, private messages and emails. It sounds like there should be plenty of example for us to investigate."
(He made it sound like he's never heard that there have been complaints and that they were figments of my imagination, eh?)
Anyway, here's a clicky to the thread. It also outlines a bunch of changes that are going to be made to RVPR.
If you can spare the time, please give this guy some insight.
