BCSnob wrote:
valhalla360 wrote:
Red herring argument...
So is the EIA wrong?
The 2050 numbers...who knows. I don't know who they are or what their agenda is. Give me a dart board & a blindfold and I can probably do just as accurate of a prediction. I do find is suspect if they are assuming 75% or more vehicles will be EV by 2050.
But your argument that only EVs are called out for significant increases in power consumption is the red herring argument.
Wait, I re-read it. They are projecting only 7% of the vehicle fleet as EV by 2050, so if EVs remain a fringe option, yeah, they are probably right.
If EVs actually become a substantial portion of the market, they are dead wrong.