There should be no subsidy for ethanol gas in the first place. And it should be taxed at the same rate as regular gasoline.
If a new power source can't compete on it's on with out taxpayer money, or borrowed government money, it shouldn't exist.
When gasoline get too expensive, then alternate sources become more economically viable.
tatest wrote:
Here it might cost 10 cents to 40 cents more per gallon, at 30 cents it doesn't save me money in improved MPG. So I don't seek out the stations that have it. Lately about $2.40 for E10 or less, $2.70 for no ethanol. One of my vehicles is flex fuel, and I actually save money running E85 if the price is at least 60 cents lower, but I lately been finding that only in a couple of corn belt states that totally forego road taxes on E85. The Federal subsidy for ethanol has been shrinking, and may not much longer even cover the higher production costs.
I do buy it for my small engines, but all of those together don't use more than four gallons a year, so at twice as much it might be worth it to avoid equipment trouble on the tiny two-strokes.