otrfun wrote:
Honda EU2200i has an OHC 121cc engine vs. the new Yamaha's EF2200iS 79cc OHV engine. IMO, an OHC engine is an inherently better, more efficient design.
What is better about an OHC design? I understand the desire for the larger displacement (more power to turn the actual generator). But I find both of your other claims to be questionable at the last.
There's nothing more efficient about an OHC over a conventional OHV design. Some of the best, most efficient, and most powerful engines on earth use OHV engines. 2 of the big 3 use OHV gasoline engines exclusively in their full size trucks, and Ford just released details on their newest engine, and guess what? It's OHV. There is nothing wrong with OHV engines. I'll admit by bias, though. I won't own ANY vehicle with an overhead cam engine. I have zero interest in them and to this day, I'm convinced they are a solution in search of a problem to solve.
Also, if 79ccs will make enough horsepower to create the rated output, I also dispute that a 121cc engine to do the same thing will be more efficient. Gasoline still burns most efficiently at 14.7:1, and an engine almost twice the size will have to burn more fuel even at the same load, unless there is some kind of vast disparity in design where friction or some other variable makes up the difference (not likely).