A different take on the popular ‘Carbon Dioxide Narrative’
A cogent construct worthy of serious consideration! (e.g. an anecdote to ‘outcome based’ modeling)… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-nsU_DaIZE 3 tons
Forum Discussion
pianotuna wrote:
co2 levels this high have not been experienced for 100,000 years. It is causing global temperatures to rise, just as it did then. The speed of increase in temperature is unprecedented. For ever 1.8 F (1 c) rise about 1 billion people will be displaced. You believe this is a good thing? USA is trying to keep folks out from their southern border.
As to information, there are many sites that agree co2 levels rising is not good. Google is your friend, so I'm not going down that rabbit hole with you.
-30-
Well, not sure what this has to do with our Border Crisis (maybe Justin T. could help out in this matter?) I can only reply that I don’t invest much in ‘FEAR Po#n’…So I continue to forge ahead with the humility of a student, in the spirit of skepticism and enquiry (e.g. the Socratic method…)…Contrary to accepted narrative, climate projections exist only as a complexity of complexities, thus extreme prudence (and a panoply of multi-faceted scientific disciplines to validate projections…) is necessary when making such claims…
I would only note here that some climate Scientists (recent joint Finnish and Japanese study) have reported that above all, the ‘‘number one’ cause of climate change is due to variances in cosmic rays heating of the atmosphere, yet curiously this study seems to remain patently dismissed…(why is this??)…I might also add that the elevated CO2 levels (a minor constituent of the atmosphere), millennial past pre-date even humans, thus a bit of forecast humility (as opposed to arrogance…) seems at least somewhat in order…
As to the slight of Google (as my friend - huh?) yep I do occasionally peruse there (as many others may…), but more importantly I believe the best approach is to remain open to the continuance of dialogue from all competent sources, as opposed to casually dismissing well-grounded, opposing points of view as ‘advance-determined’ to be ‘out of hand’ - to do so is to reject Aristotles ‘scientific method’ by reverting to the medieval ‘Scientism’ (stellar mysticism) of the past…JMO
3 tons
