A different take on the popular ‘Carbon Dioxide Narrative’

2112 wrote:

3 tons wrote:
A cogent construct worthy of serious consideration! (e.g. an anecdote to ‘outcome based’ modeling)…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-nsU_DaIZE

3 tons

WOW, this it is an old one.
Isn't Matt Ridley that conspiracy theory book peddler who still collects coal royalties?

Got it!…..(don’t like the message, shoot the messenger!!)

3 tons

How does a British politicians misleading claims about climate have anything whatsoever to do with technical issues on RVs?

3 tons wrote:
A cogent construct worthy of serious consideration! (e.g. an anecdote to ‘outcome based’ modeling)…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-nsU_DaIZE

3 tons

WOW, this it is an old one.
Isn't Matt Ridley that conspiracy theory book peddler who still collects coal royalties?

BB_TX wrote:
And another viewpoint.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKmz7OGcyzU

This video dissects Peters presentation of the data

It is far from balanced.

For example the extinctions. http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/digitaaldepot/20040108nature.pdf

And another viewpoint.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKmz7OGcyzU

Finally a more complete, balanced and substantial explanation of our world resources.

Thank you, 3 tons, for this insightful video.
LeRoy

Is there more co2 in the atmosphere than there was 100 years ago?

Is it increasing at an unprecedented rate?

Is the world average temperatures going up?

Three strikes and he is out.

The "Reason TV" is funded by the Koch brothers and Sarah Scaife Foundation. It is a subset of a far right "think tank".