best low light performance
Hi, Amorphous panels are clearly the best for low light performance--but are relatively speaking huge. Does any one know if Poly or Mono are better in low light?
Forum Discussion
Hi mena,
No, I did not "put it on the table". I asked which was more likely to do well in low light mono, or poly. harold is just muddying the waters.
I am considering mono or poly. Amorphous, nice as they are, just take too much space. There are thousands of references to amorphous and low light. But that is NOT my question.
I apologize if my question was unclear.
No, I did not "put it on the table". I asked which was more likely to do well in low light mono, or poly. harold is just muddying the waters.
I am considering mono or poly. Amorphous, nice as they are, just take too much space. There are thousands of references to amorphous and low light. But that is NOT my question.
I apologize if my question was unclear.
mena661 wrote:smkettner wrote:Don mentioned amorphous in his first post. He put it on the table but I agree we can move on.
Harold, there are two choices. Why strongly debate a choice that is not even on the table?
You may as well recommend a generator :R
