Hi pnichols,
My (limited) understanding is that starved acid batteries run out of "working fluid" before the plates are fully discharged. i.e. there is no acid left in the battery, only water--but if there were more acid available that another 20% discharge could be done. That allows the sales pitch to say they can be totally discharged and may recover totally. It may also limit damage to the plates.
That leaves the group 31 susceptible to freezing. It also (guessing) probably means that charging profile demands are a bit squirrely.
Group 29 are not the same design as group 31 or so I have been lead to believe. i.e. the group 29 is not starved as much. That may be untrue.
My own batteries are a telecom design with a specific gravity of 1.300 and are surplus acid. This means I must treat them as if they are regular flooded batteries, with the exception of no equalization and take them no lower than 50% of fully charged. If I flatten them totally I'll damage the plates and permanently reduce capacity.
On my own system I have to limit charging to no more than 110 amps for 556 amp-hours of battery bank. i.e. 27 amps per jar. Fortunately, my Magnum inverter/charger allows me to control that parameter.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that you need to investigate what the maker recommends and follow it. If you don't then you may be treated to a shortened life span, with early loss of capacity.
Because I chose surplus acid jars I investigated them as much as I could. I do not consider myself an expert on AGM in general.
pnichols wrote:
pianotuna wrote:
The Group 31 is a starved acid format. 31's are not forgiving of errors. I'd lean towards group 29 myself.
Don ... would you explain this comment in a little more detail?
In other words:
1) Isn't any size of 6V AGM battery and any size of 12V AGM battery starved acid?
AND
2) Isn't any size or voltage of wet acid batteries not starved acid?
(However, I may not know what you meant by "starved acid"!)