Forum Discussion
MEXICOWANDERER
Apr 18, 2017Explorer
What gets me is the E CAVEAT EMPTOR approach by the FCC with regard to rating receptor/receiver noise rejection. Foggy Bottom Of Ensconced Fools, spending billions annually while completely stupid (or arrogant) to consumer issues.
Yeah it means I would not be adverse to strict regulations governing inadvertent noise transmission from generating devices. Ignition secondary. Output noise transmission from connector cords. Oooooooo what a transmitter antenna.
Want to sell a radio receiver in the USA? Better meet minimum standards for RF and IF noise rejection. Of course this means "government" whose first duty is to make thyself indispensable.
Yeah it means I would not be adverse to strict regulations governing inadvertent noise transmission from generating devices. Ignition secondary. Output noise transmission from connector cords. Oooooooo what a transmitter antenna.
Want to sell a radio receiver in the USA? Better meet minimum standards for RF and IF noise rejection. Of course this means "government" whose first duty is to make thyself indispensable.
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,238 PostsLatest Activity: Apr 24, 2025