Well, Since there’s nary a LFP enquiry that comes up where either BFL or PT don’t inject the heretofore ‘seemingly undeterminable’ (??) virtues of SiO2’s (rather than to tout on a dedicated SiO2 thread??…), except for the possible case of ‘morning after sickness’ (I donno?…..), I don’t get their ‘shape-shifting’ like motivation, or their insatiable excursions into highly speculative ‘LFP nuance’ (“learning” - Really…??) of a battery type that most others have long attested, while different, ‘are yet quite simple to operate’ (BTW, by this juncture, reams of deep-dive transparency is widely accessible to those of serious interest - but not so much with SiO2…), and of a battery type neither one of which have posited even the least stated interest in procuring??
So maybe it’s due to my simplistic mindset (kinda, “if it looks like a duck…” thingy - lol!), but after what’s been (say, since discovery of their coveted SiO2’s…) a relentless and never ending pattern of ‘uber rich in nuance’ ploys and rabbit-hole like LFP investigations, how long is one to keep feeding a most repetitive yet insatiable (in figurative terms) beast??
Therefore (over numerous months…), I’ve come to see these particular repeating enquiries as mostly (if not even abjectly) disingenuous (note: but always couched within the usual patina of sincerity), or maybe associated with a mischievous computer keyboard addiction employed to ‘capture’ folks otherwise scarce time…Admittedly, JMHO after many studied observations - trolling for attention is the road to nowhere…
3 tons