Mercedes ditching diesels in North America
Here is a blurb about this. Is this meaning that Sprinters will be made with gasoline engines, or pulled out of the market completely?
Forum Discussion
Forcing one's self to live in reality is anything but a "dis-incentive" What it is is a clear eyed realization of what things are going to be REALLY like and not the processed opinion of someone who has no idea of what a developed concept entails.
Try and follow my bread crumbs left throughout the discussion. Two realities exposed. The first one deals with infrastructure expansion. It has to be done. It will be done and YOU will be involved in the payment process.
Perhaps I should have avoided obtaining an economics degree. Even though it is ludicrous to think a degree is necessary to see the TITANIC SHORTFALL in general revenue funds that will no longer be supplied on a federal, state or local level by taxes paid on petroleum. "Oooooo everyone should rejoice!" government says "You were good little boys and girls!" Therefore we are dispensing with any notion of transferring the debt load onto electrical use AND GENERATION.
This is not tit for tat. If it was tit for tat, the cost of CONSTRUCTING infrastructure would not create a tax obligation. Tens of millions of tons of steel for transmission, millions of tons of aluminum, thousands and tens of thousands of new transformers. Cost of acquiring property and easements. Salaries for employees to maintain the added infrastructure.
But wait! Somehow it's going to all work out and be FREE FREE FREE! Despite a political system that wants nothing more than fewer taxes for corporate endeavors while their opponents are cast in stone Tax and Spend.
You can start off by doing a workup on the amount of petroleum sales in the USA and the revenue generated by such sales.
Wuuwee, the screams of my economics professors resonate in my ears :(
Try and follow my bread crumbs left throughout the discussion. Two realities exposed. The first one deals with infrastructure expansion. It has to be done. It will be done and YOU will be involved in the payment process.
Perhaps I should have avoided obtaining an economics degree. Even though it is ludicrous to think a degree is necessary to see the TITANIC SHORTFALL in general revenue funds that will no longer be supplied on a federal, state or local level by taxes paid on petroleum. "Oooooo everyone should rejoice!" government says "You were good little boys and girls!" Therefore we are dispensing with any notion of transferring the debt load onto electrical use AND GENERATION.
This is not tit for tat. If it was tit for tat, the cost of CONSTRUCTING infrastructure would not create a tax obligation. Tens of millions of tons of steel for transmission, millions of tons of aluminum, thousands and tens of thousands of new transformers. Cost of acquiring property and easements. Salaries for employees to maintain the added infrastructure.
But wait! Somehow it's going to all work out and be FREE FREE FREE! Despite a political system that wants nothing more than fewer taxes for corporate endeavors while their opponents are cast in stone Tax and Spend.
You can start off by doing a workup on the amount of petroleum sales in the USA and the revenue generated by such sales.
Wuuwee, the screams of my economics professors resonate in my ears :(
