2oldman wrote:
4X4Dodger wrote:
and Honda has cynically decided that RV'ers will pay whatever they ask just to have that name.
Oh, it's a little more than just that name.
Agree, 2oldman, it's more than just the name. The Hondas do offer better overall performance than nearly all of their competitors.
But, 4x4Dodger still has a point. Is it worth spending 2 to 3 times more for this difference in performance? For some, yes. For others, no.
The EU2000i and EU3000iS have been in production close to 10 years with very little change. Honda long ago recouped their initial R&D costs. At this point and time, odds are high that Honda's per unit production costs are probably as low as some of their MIC competitors that offer less performance. Bottom line, Honda is charging what the market will bear . . . and making an absolute killing in the process.
Hey, that's capitalism at its best. Good for Honda and their stockholders.
I believe the frustration that 4x4Dodger expressed is based on why a hungry, industrious company somewhere hasn't seen fit to make a more serious effort to grab some of this windfall profit from Honda during the last 10 years. The Dream Machine(s): As quiet or quieter than the EU3000iS, with proportionally the same or higher inrush current capability as the EU2000i.
We'd ALL benefit if Honda had more serious competition.