Forum Discussion
time2roll
Oct 28, 2014Nomad
BFL13 wrote:Yes I do believe when speed charging there is a bit of 'surface' charge to the 90%. I further believe some of the natural sulfation is harder to remove and takes more time that a speed charge does not allow. So you get home and you have to deal with this more difficult sulfation. A slower charge reduces the effect. JMHOsmkettner wrote:
80 amps for what two minutes? Then you are tapering quickly and will have BFLs sulfation issues requiring extended top charging upon return.
When you do a 50-90 either of the three ways shown in my ugly graph, you still end up at the same 90, so what difference is there wrt sulfation?
I suspect smk still believes there is a "quality" to the recharge using a lower charge rate. I can't see that in doing 50-90s. 90 is 90 no matter how you get there. There are not two kinds of 90, one better than the other.
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,344 PostsLatest Activity: Dec 26, 2025