Forum Discussion
FWC
Nov 01, 2020Explorer
This doesn't actually provide any useful information on whether the manufacturers claims are actually true - as the review just rehashes the marketing claims. And the 'results' don't provide any actual data.
It is also a little suspicious that this 'review' seems to be used as a testimonial by the manufacturer, even thought the review doesn't actually provide any independent information and links back to the manufacturer. Is this guy another influencer? Who knows?
It is also a little suspicious that this 'review' seems to be used as a testimonial by the manufacturer, even thought the review doesn't actually provide any independent information and links back to the manufacturer. Is this guy another influencer? Who knows?
pianotuna wrote:
FWC,
The owner of the sanidump site has a 'real life' evaluation of the SiO2.
https://www.sanidumps.com/product-testing-rv-batteries.php
From his site: "Results
After about a year (2020) of using the SiO2 batteries, I'm I happy with them - Yes! Having more useable power is great when the weather is not behaving, I prefer not to use a generator. I do have a lot of solar on the RV but I have been in situations where the sun does not fully charge the batteries every day. The extra capacity enables us to continue RVing in these poor weather conditions without the generator. I have been with friends when their RV had to be recharged, with the SiO2 batteries and solar I was able to recharge their batteries from my RV without using a generator and we continued RVing."
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,190 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 24, 2025