Forum Discussion
harold1946
May 04, 2013Explorer
Salvo wrote:
OK, I forgive you. Did you look who wrote the article? It's a lady who writes about organic gardening and wild foods. The 1.1% may have come from a high school science project. Just goes to show you can't believe everything you read. Their science project has a fatal error. They applied a constant resistive load (55.8 ohm) to the panel under test. They though that's the correct load to get the maximum power point. Well, it may get MPP at 25C, but MPP changes with temperature. They introduced a huge measurement error.
Here's a credible analysis for the power temperature coefficient. His range is -0.4 to -0.5%/C.
Salharold1946 wrote:
Salvo:
http://greenliving.nationalgeographic.com/effects-temperature-solar-panel-power-production-20500.html
Cindy Hill authored the article, she did not conduct the study. Oh how qiuck we are to dismiss what we care not to believe.
I guess you would also dismiss the study conducted by the Rivers State University of science and technology, which found very similar results.
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,253 PostsLatest Activity: May 19, 2025