Forum Discussion
jrnymn7
Jan 18, 2015Explorer
I corrected my previous post. It would only be an extra $10/month, not $20, so even better.
-------------------
Let's face it, most boondockers do not have a generator large enough to run a 200 or 300 amp charger. But do they really need such a beast? My eu2000i can handle a PFC 75a charger. With LiFePo, at near 100% charging efficiency, I would be able to replace my usual two day usage of ~65Ah's (15% of 430Ah) in under an hour. On my 430Ah bank of four GC-2's, that takes closer to 4 hours of gen run time. And yes, I could operate in the 70-85% SOC range, and replace those 65Ah's in an hour, but once a week I would still have to top up my bank, and that would take at least another 3-4 hours. Plus the deeper cycles would decrease life expectancy enormously.
If comparing LiFePo to AGM, in either case, it's likely no-one will be charging at a rate of 2C-3C. 60-100 amps of charge current is still plenty for a moderately sized bank. And I imagine there would be less wasted power when low C-rate solar charging, as well.
I do, however, share Mex's concern regarding all the technology/gadgetry required to safely charge Li batteries. I felt the same when I bought my '98 Explorer Limited. That was a big jump from an '86 Chevy Blazer. But Li has been around for a little while, and is used by NASA for their satellites, and in the Ev industry, so that is where the research and development is taking us.
-------------------
Let's face it, most boondockers do not have a generator large enough to run a 200 or 300 amp charger. But do they really need such a beast? My eu2000i can handle a PFC 75a charger. With LiFePo, at near 100% charging efficiency, I would be able to replace my usual two day usage of ~65Ah's (15% of 430Ah) in under an hour. On my 430Ah bank of four GC-2's, that takes closer to 4 hours of gen run time. And yes, I could operate in the 70-85% SOC range, and replace those 65Ah's in an hour, but once a week I would still have to top up my bank, and that would take at least another 3-4 hours. Plus the deeper cycles would decrease life expectancy enormously.
If comparing LiFePo to AGM, in either case, it's likely no-one will be charging at a rate of 2C-3C. 60-100 amps of charge current is still plenty for a moderately sized bank. And I imagine there would be less wasted power when low C-rate solar charging, as well.
I do, however, share Mex's concern regarding all the technology/gadgetry required to safely charge Li batteries. I felt the same when I bought my '98 Explorer Limited. That was a big jump from an '86 Chevy Blazer. But Li has been around for a little while, and is used by NASA for their satellites, and in the Ev industry, so that is where the research and development is taking us.
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,369 PostsLatest Activity: Mar 12, 2026