mena661 wrote:
There's a caveat to this though. FLAs work perfectly for high wattage draws. There's tons of people here that do this all the time. The advantage with AGM's in this situation is if you only have room for TWO batteries but want to repeatedly use the MW or other high draw device with a partially discharged battery (say less than 60% SOC). 4 6V's (FLA's) work just fine for high draws IF you have the room for them. Also, 12V FLA's only have a little less sag than AGM's. It's the 6V's that have the biggest sag but you can simply add more then there's no problem.
Well said!
Just realize that when you use 4 x GCs or better, you are lowering the Amp draw per battery, and therefore moving towards another
low Amp draw where I agree that deep cycle FLA will run longer.
In the two battery case, the higher draw capability of the AGM shows up in longer run times.
E.g., In a capacity test, I used a 900W elec kettle to boil a a qt. of water in 7 min with a
single Deka 79AH 53lb AGM. That represents a ~100% C20 draw, or 78A. The battery was 4+yrs old. In 6V GC terms you would need a 220A draw for 7min to match that.
Compared to a
pair of GCs, a pair of equal weight 100AH AGM 12Vs or 6Vs is a reasonable choice and would give a more dynamic usage.
Almot;
In my recent research re 6V GCs, I learned that 30A/battery is normal for golf carts, therefore wouldn't that be exactly how those batteries are designed? Why wouldn't they last longer?
westend:
I guess I misunderstood your meaning for dynamic. I viewed it as the ability for a bank to do a days camping in the manner the RVer desires.
If you meant life cycles, a person may find no valuable difference between battery types on an 80% drawdown life cycle(discharge-recharge) basis.
Suppose we did a study and found that AGM cost $1/month more. Is that a valuable difference? If one type does 1000 cycles and the other does 500 cycles is that valuable? 500 weekends is 10 years!
HTH;
John