Hensley Arrow: How does it REALLY work?
There have been several discussions on this hitch that have become somewhat 'controversial'. I am NOT trying to stir this controversy/bashing back up. Instead, I'd like to see a good, intelligent di...
Forum Discussion
jdwhittaker wrote:
I like to try to avoid using terms like never, or always, I find them to be too absolute, which usually leaves me open to have a clever guy poke a hole in my story..belief...theory, or whatever. Sorry
BTW, I wasn't attempting to show potential angles of articulation in my video, but rather the HA,s motion. I'm aware that TV to TT interference can occur at those angles(approximately 165 degrees by Hensley Mfg.'s account).
Dave
Not to worry Dave, when you get to be an old fart (like some of the posters here - this one in particular) you'll have learned that you have to qualify everything 'cuz there's always some smart-a** (like me) around looking to score a point. There actually are a few times when absolutes work. Some non-scientific types like to challenge the notion that there is anything such as an absolute fact or that there is no such thing as right or wrong.
My usual response when challenged to prove something as fact is gravity. I can demonstrate it going and coming, and there is no ordinary way to come to any other conclusion. While it's a black and white issue for most of us, I've actually had some products of the public education system want to argue about it. Limbaugh has the solution for this situation too, let them talk -- as long as they want to. Makes for a good laugh.
Anyway, the problem with the demo is that while most of us owners have seen that articulation, it's a bit confusing for the non-owners 'cuz the TV can't make gyrations like that. I suggest it would be easier to visualize from the TV point of view - if you could get it..
Regards
Ed
